[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 4 (12-2018) ::
GEJ 2018, 9(4): 67-77 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Two Methods of Classification of SAM and BEC for the Separation of Geological Units
P. Safar Beyranvand , A. Hossingholizade
Abstract:   (3128 Views)
The issue of mapping geological units during an evolving process has now reached a point where the detection and classification of geological units is carried out with the help of hyperspectral sensing. In this study, using hyperspectral image of Hyperion sensor, related to Khorramabad area in Lorestan province, using Spectral Angle Mapper and Binary Encoding Classification algorithms for detecting and separating geological units. After performing the necessary preprocesses, the MNF conversion and the PPI algorithm were applied, respectively, to reduce data and extract pure pixels on the image, respectively. From the overlapping of pure pixels with geological units and ground data, the average spectrum for each member was extracted. Then, these net members were used as inputs for the above-mentioned algorithms and image classification was performed. Field surveys and ground sampling (at the points provided by the spectral angle scanners and BEC) confirm the superiority of the SAM method in separating geological units. Finally, by checking the correctness of the algorithms by calculating the error matrix, the accuracy of the classification of each method for sam (68.83) and BEC (32.60) respectively, revealed that at the end of the algorithm SAM with a total accuracy of 68.83 was introduced as the best classification algorithm.
Keywords: BEC - SAM - MNF- Geological Units, Pure Members-Hyperion Image
Full-Text [PDF 928 kb]   (2894 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Photo&RS
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safar Beyranvand P, Hossingholizade A. Comparison of Two Methods of Classification of SAM and BEC for the Separation of Geological Units. GEJ 2018; 9 (4) :67-77
URL: http://gej.issgeac.ir/article-1-254-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 4 (12-2018) Back to browse issues page
نشریه علمی مهندسی نقشه برداری و اطلاعات مکانی Geospatial Engineering Journal